Quick Actions

Co-chairs should meet with new members individually to:

  • Introduce the structure and goals of the committee
  • Clarify roles, expectations, and responsibilities
  • Explain workflows, working culture and norms, and decision-making processes
  • Identify any initial access needs and come up with a plan to meet them

Barriers these actions address

Difficulty receiving and communicating information

Why is this a problem?

When access needs are not considered, many people will have trouble getting or understanding information. Some things to consider include:

  • Language is often too technical and full of jargon.
  • Documents and materials are often not shared early enough to allow people to prepare.
  • PDFs, videos, or online content are not always accessible (e.g., screen-reader friendly, captioned, or transcribed).
  • In fast or large group discussions, many people get left behind, especially when they are new to the subject matter. This is magnified for D/deaf and Hard of Hearing people who rely on sign language/interpretation.
  • Blind or low-vision people often can’t see body language, facial expressions, or visual cues that clarifies information being communicated.
  • Visual content like slides, diagrams, or infographics are often not described clearly.
  • Using multiple channels at once, such as chat, email and verbal discussion, can be confusing and often does not work well for people using screen readers.

People may also have trouble sharing their thoughts or participating. Some things to consider include:

  • Meetings that lack structured ways to take turns or contribute often leave out neurodiverse people who require clear structures. This can also be a disadvantage for people who depend on sign language/interpretation, such as D/deaf and Hard of Hearing people.
  • Without clear cues, new members often worry about interrupting and miss opportunities to contribute.
  • Lack of quiet or low-stimulation options can make participation harder for people with sensory sensitivities.
  • Poor audio, video, or caption quality in remote meetings can prevent people from fully participating.
  • People are less likely to continue sharing when they don’t get feedback on whether their contributions were received or understood.

Ways to address the barrier

  • Host onboarding meetings before committee work begins
  • Make communications multi-modal and consistent
  • Plan what to do if goals aren’t met
  • Provide a welcome package for new members
  • Provide translation and interpretation for everyone

Dominant “expert” culture

Why is this a problem?

Some committees treat long-time members and technical experts as the most important voices.

This can lead to:

  • A few people dominating meetings while others stay quiet.
  • New members feeling unsure about speaking up or feeling they have to prove themselves before being taken seriously.
  • Jargon and insider language making it hard for new members to understand.
  • Questions from new members being dismissed instead of answered.
  • Non-technical people feeling less valued and pressured to speak like technical experts instead of sharing their real-world knowledge of marginalization or disability.
  • Long-time members having more influence, even without formal authority.
  • Decisions being made during side conversations instead of openly.

Ways to address the barrier

  • Empower chairs and facilitators to manage conflict
  • Host onboarding meetings before committee work begins
  • Use inclusive approaches for decision-making

Lack of clear and accessible onboarding process

Why is this a problem?

Many organizations don’t have an onboarding process for new members, which can cause several problems including:

  • New members may have to figure things out on their own or rely on friends or colleagues for guidance.
  • Members can feel overwhelmed, unsure of what’s expected, or confused about how to work with others.
  • The amount and complexity of information can be intimidating, especially if there’s no guidance on where to start and could cause new members to leave.
  • For members with accessibility needs, accommodations may not be put in place early enough.

Ways to address the barrier

  • Agree together how the committee will work
  • Be transparent in the application process
  • Host onboarding meetings before committee work begins
  • Plan what to do if goals aren’t met
  • Provide a welcome package for new members

Lack of training and support for committee members

Why is this a problem?

Committee members often require mentoring and training in order to participate effectively. Challenges include:

  • Long, confusing, or overwhelming getting started guides.
  • No guidance for navigating the volume of information and resources.
  • Lack of mentoring and peer support for committee work.
  • Little or no training on collaboration, teamwork, or technical processes.
  • Limited awareness or guidance on accessibility, equity, and inclusive participation.
  • No clear pathway to develop skills for becoming a chair or leading working groups.

Ways to address the barrier

  • Host onboarding meetings before committee work begins
  • Provide guidance and ongoing support to new members
  • Provide ongoing accessibility and inclusion training
  • Provide translation and interpretation for everyone

Lack of training and support for chairs and facilitators

Why is this a problem?

Chairs and facilitators often need help to run inclusive and accessible meetings, but support is limited. Common problems include:

  • Few resources are available on how to lead inclusively and accessibly to ensure everyone, including D/deaf and D/disabled people, can participate.
  • Little guidance is provided on managing diverse or cross-cultural groups.
  • Time and resources to manage both technical and accessibility tasks are limited.
  • Handling conflict resolution without enough training and support.
  • Knowledge of accessible technology for virtual meetings and document sharing is not common.

Ways to address the barrier

  • Choose accessible meeting spaces
  • Empower chairs and facilitators to manage conflict
  • Host onboarding meetings before committee work begins
  • Make remote/virtual/online meetings accessible
  • Provide chairs with practical support and tools for accessibility
  • Provide ongoing accessibility and inclusion training
  • Provide translation and interpretation for everyone
  • Use inclusive approaches for decision-making

People don’t start at the same place

Why is this a problem?

Standards work is often very technical and complex, and assumes people already know how things work. When information is too technical, it is hard for newcomers or people without a technical background to participate. Efforts to diversify participation need to recognize that people have different levels of experience and knowledge. Without proper support, many people will be left out.

Ways to address the barrier

  • Empower chairs and facilitators to manage conflict
  • Ensure all documents are accessible
  • Help with information management
  • Host onboarding meetings before committee work begins
  • Plan for regular check-ins with new members
  • Provide a welcome package for new members
  • Provide diverse, accessible knowledge-building opportunities
  • Provide guidance and ongoing support to new members

Unclear participation information

Why is this a problem?

Many standards organizations do not clearly explain what committee roles involve at the time of application. Providing details like who is on the committee, what they do, and how to contact them is necessary.

As a result, people are often left with basic unanswered questions, such as:

  • Eligibility and who the role is for
    • Who can apply?
    • Who is the committee looking for?
    • What does “expertise” mean (formal credentials, lived experience, or both)?
    • What experience or skills are required?
  • Role expectations and responsibilities
    • What will I actually be doing in this role?
    • What are the main responsibilities?
    • How much influence do members have?
    • How are decisions made (consensus, voting, chair decision)?
  • Time and workload
    • What is the time commitment (hours per month)?
    • How often are meetings?
    • How long are meetings?
    • What is the expected length of membership (months/years)?
  • Meetings and participation format
    • Are meetings online, hybrid, or in-person?
    • What time zone are meetings based in?
    • Are meetings during work hours or evenings?
    • Will I need to travel?
  • Accessibility and accommodations
    • Will accommodations be provided (sign language/interpretation, captions, accessible documents)?
    • How do I request accommodations, and when?
    • Are plain language versions available?
    • What happens if I face accessibility barriers during the process?
  • Costs, pay, and support
    • Is the role paid, volunteer, or supported with an honorarium?
    • Who covers costs like travel, internet, or software?
    • Will support be provided for assistive technology needs?
  • Application process and next steps
    • What happens after I apply?
    • How long will it take to hear back?
    • Who can I contact if I have questions before applying?
  • Safety, inclusion, and accountability
    • How will diversity and intersectionality be considered?
    • What is the process if someone experiences discrimination or harm?
    • What happens if I need to step back temporarily due to disability, caregiving, or health?
  • Recognition and credit
    • How will my contribution be recognized?
    • Will my name be listed publicly?
    • Will I be credited in the final standard or related materials?

Ways to address the barrier

  • Be transparent in the application process
  • Create a shared support system
  • Host onboarding meetings before committee work begins
  • Make communications multi-modal and consistent
  • Provide a welcome package for new members